[Neo1973] AGPS - globallocal cuckoo's egg? Re: AGPS server questions
openmoko at robertmichel.de
Wed Dec 13 15:37:12 CET 2006
Gabriel Ambuehl schrieb am Mittwoch, den 13. Dezember 2006 um 14:24h:
> On Wednesday 13 December 2006 13:57, Robert Michel wrote:
> > I fear AGPS from globallocal is a coockoo's egg - they anounced that
> > their AGPS chips cost only 5 US$ - I fear they will make money with
> > their AGPS server services
> If the GPS can do indoor GPS without assistance (which is what the site seems
> to suggest, to me anyway) were are still better off than with a similar GPS
> only chip that has neither indoor nor AGPS features, right?
> If it won't do that, the chip is rather useless to me.
when it would be not so much data that is transmitted via GPRS,
because we select only the needed satellites and use a good
compression... I can image enough situation that this GPRS traffic
would worth it.
> There's no way in hell I'm gonna *pay* someone to constantly know where I
> am ;)
> > > - get authority from cell providers and network operators for
> > > AGPS to go through them
> > GPRS/SSL
> Agreed, if you pay for the traffic, they better do not interfere with it. The
> telcos being common carriers could even get into major trouble for doing
> that, let's just hope network neutrality is being upheld...
Network neutrality is no question for GPRS/SSL.
A dream would be, when the network poeretor wouldn't be just neutral,
when they serve assited GPS data for free or a fixed price (1-2
When there is an open protocoll for serve assited data
It seems that SUPL (Secure User Plane Location) is for this,
HP has an own protcoll and did compared both here:
And an idea for an WAP extension:
Because some network operators have interesting tariffs with wap flat,
it could be work to serve LTO or AGPS data via wap to have fixed costs.
More information about the community