dan at dan1son.net
Fri Nov 17 17:00:46 CET 2006
Not a problem. I will not think any differently of anyone. I just
wanted to argue my point a little more.
I suppose, like him, I'm not afraid to speak my mind.
Consider the issue closed.
Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
> On 11/17/06 1:49 PM, "Dan Koester" <dan at dan1son.net> wrote:
>> I didn't realize there were such strong feelings towards these ideas...
>> I do see the reasons for the reply-to address... but the subject line
>> doesn't make sense to me at all. I feel it's a huge advantage to add a
>> prefix that is well known.
> Please don't take any of this personally. Stefan's a great guy and like so
> many really technical people, he not afraid to speak his mind and get
> straight to the point. Which, IMHO, is a good thing.
> We haven't heard much complaints over this issue because it really is the
> standard on Free Software mailing lists. Most email clients have rules that
> can be set on any header field to filter this automatically. Let us know if
> you need help!
> And thanks again for your interest in OpenMoko!
> OpenMoko community mailing list
> community at lists.openmoko.org
More information about the community