need someone to develop this....

Joe Pfeiffer joseph at
Sat Dec 1 18:30:58 CET 2007

GWMobile writes:
>I don't think discussing this here would be considered an open 
>Talking on a finite list or limited membership with moderation and thus 
>controlled membership is not necessarily open disclosure and not the 
>same as a public printing therefore I think it would still be 

IANAL, but my reading is that since the archives are public, it counts
as disclosure.

The good news is that if somebody *else* tries to patent it in the
future, there's really solid prior art!

More information about the community mailing list