need someone to develop this....
joseph at pfeifferfamily.net
Sat Dec 1 18:30:58 CET 2007
>I don't think discussing this here would be considered an open
>Talking on a finite list or limited membership with moderation and thus
>controlled membership is not necessarily open disclosure and not the
>same as a public printing therefore I think it would still be
IANAL, but my reading is that since the archives are public, it counts
The good news is that if somebody *else* tries to patent it in the
future, there's really solid prior art!
More information about the community