R: Camera and MMS

Ian Stirling openmoko at mauve.plus.com
Wed Feb 14 12:23:55 CET 2007

Alexander Steinert wrote:

><t3st3r, Wed 2007-02-14 10:09 CET>
>>However I have nothing against the following: two models, one 
>>with camera and one without it. However I have no idea how hard and 
>>costly this to implement (usually, developing 2 devices costs more but 
>>probably dropping features is relatively easy - just do not solder some 
>>parts on same PCB and use a bit altered case).
>I just want to remind you of my suggestion: Camera is internal but neo
>has two backs, one with hole(s) for lens (and flash) and another one
>covering the camera parts. See point 5 in
Having a camera trivially (pop back off, take piccy) enableable may be a 
It would be nice if the camera with one back was a fingerprint scanner, 
with the other a camera, and with no back, just a blur - from the 'no 
camera' rules point of view.

More information about the community mailing list