R: Camera and MMS
Ian Stirling
openmoko at mauve.plus.com
Wed Feb 14 12:23:55 CET 2007
Alexander Steinert wrote:
><t3st3r, Wed 2007-02-14 10:09 CET>
>
>
>>However I have nothing against the following: two models, one
>>with camera and one without it. However I have no idea how hard and
>>costly this to implement (usually, developing 2 devices costs more but
>>probably dropping features is relatively easy - just do not solder some
>>parts on same PCB and use a bit altered case).
>>
>>
>
>I just want to remind you of my suggestion: Camera is internal but neo
>has two backs, one with hole(s) for lens (and flash) and another one
>covering the camera parts. See point 5 in
>http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2006-November/000335.html
>
>
Having a camera trivially (pop back off, take piccy) enableable may be a
problem.
It would be nice if the camera with one back was a fingerprint scanner,
with the other a camera, and with no back, just a blur - from the 'no
camera' rules point of view.
More information about the community
mailing list