Not "the free phone" (was: Re: Again: Advertising thoughts
cephdon at gmail.com
Mon Jul 16 21:16:57 CEST 2007
OK.. Great minds think alike... Or maybe not. /grin
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:11, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
> How about simply the youPhone, or uPhone?
> On 7/16/07, Ian Darwin <ian at darwinsys.com> wrote:
>>> I completely agree. My idea is to make two advertisment campains:
>>> one on
>>> "maisntream media": maybe tv, maybe radio, flyre, poster, newspapers,
>>> wathever. This ads would be something like: "The free phone,
>>> The only one with ...." "The OpenMoko: now with builtin navigator" and
>>> so on. Don't even THINK of using "based on Linux Kernel 2.6.xx" or
>>> powerful ssh acess"
>> Calling it "the free(d) phone" to consumers (as opposed to developers)
>> is going to engender an enormous amount of confusion and ill-will.
>> Why? Because (at least in North America) the major carriers have spent
>> years, and billions of dollars, totally subverting the meaning of the
>> phrase "free phone" to mean "we give you the cheapest phone we can find
>> and don't charge you for this piece of junk when you lock into a two-
>> three-year plan at some exorbitant rate that obviously includes the
>> of the phone amortized."
>> Seriously, ask consumers what a "free phone" means. at least 11 out of
>> 10 will give you the definition above, at least the parts they
>> A consumer ad campaign is NOT the place to push the "free as in beer vs
>> free as in speech" argument. The phrase "free phone" already means the
>> opposite of what we want it to mean. It's done, finished, over. Move
>> Call it something else in the consumer market. The Flexible Phone. The
>> Does-what-you-want-not-what the big corporations want. I don't know.
>> OpenMoko community mailing list
>> community at lists.openmoko.org
> OpenMoko community mailing list
> community at lists.openmoko.org
More information about the community