Camera on GTA02 / Good Addon-System needed with a chainable bus system
samon007 at gmx.net
Mon Jul 23 22:14:18 CEST 2007
I think a good planed Addon-system should do the trick.
Like the Wiki suggested there should be a spacer which fits into the
back. Some kind of bus which can be daisy chained through all back parts
and spacers. So it would be easy to develop a camera back and chain it
to the bus. If the bus would be something like USB you could just buy
an empty spacer in desired size and fit your USB device into with almost
no knowledge and just little soldering. The I2C bus should also chained
for our industrial friends.
Pitfall: the chained USB bus would need the magic 5V still missing in
Tim Newsom schrieb:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:27, coomac wrote:
>> Rather than alienate one group over the other, why not have something
>> for both? A non camera version for those who don't need the feature
>> as well as a camera version with the exact same specs for those who
>> can't live without it? I mean, why have a chip with camera support if
>> there are no plans to use if fully? Tag on a $50 difference or
>> something. Problem solved. It won't be feasible in the near future if
>> it involves a major holdup or deviation from the current product, but
>> if it's doable, why not?
> Guys & Gals...
> There have been talks of add on packs that let people increase
> thickness of the case and do things that were not really intended
> originally. Since we have a pretty strong idea that the GTA02 will
> not include a camera.. We can add it as a wishlist item for GTA03..
> And no need to argue over it.
> BUT there is the chance that some kind of addon pack could be made for
> the GTA02 after its sold.
> In this case, a production molded back plate could be included so no
> drilling would be required.
> If its planned out right, these addon packs could be simply "unscrew
> backplate, snap new addon pack down, screw on backplate, install new
> Now I will also be the first to say that it won't be this easy in the
> beginning... But it *could* eventually.
> For Instance, forget about connecting with the camera pins if they are
> not exposed and use something else, we have (maybe not optimal) I2C,
> Spi?.. But how about an option that doesn't require wires?.. Say
> bluetooth, wifi... Maybe use I2C to control the device and bluetooth
> to transfer the data..
> The point is, that for now its not going to happen.. But think a
> little outside of the box for ways to make it happen as an option.
> OpenMoko community mailing list
> community at lists.openmoko.org
More information about the community