Product naming / wiki page naming / restructuring
laforge at openmoko.org
Sat Jul 28 04:18:32 CEST 2007
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:25:26PM +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>>> OpenMoko-0.5 or whatever scheme is already in place.
>>> -2007 and -2008 so far. We might have 200x.y at some point.
> Hm. I think using year-names is not a good choice for software versions
> (mainly talking about stable releases).
I agree. wasn't my idea. In any case, it is what is in place now.
> It psychologically forces you to do one major release every year.
that's not true.
> *every* new stable release should run on *all* older hardware (at least up
> to 3 or 4 years!).
this is an entirely different discussion and I would rather not want to
mix that with the naming/versioning scheme debate.
- Harald Welte <laforge at openmoko.org> http://openmoko.org/
Software for the world's first truly open Free Software mobile phone
More information about the community