Anti theft protection of our cherished device.
buddy.baars at gmail.com
Sat Jun 30 23:39:54 CEST 2007
You are probably not alone, these things should be disabled by default.
I would chose to install a backdoor (I dislike thieves more than crackers)
but it should be an explicit choice from the user.
On 6/30/07, Ian Stirling <OpenMoko at mauve.plus.com> wrote:
> Frank Coenen wrote:
> > True. But ones the thief removed your simcard I assume he will flash the
> > firmware... And then the theft-protection will be gone as well :-(
> I've commented on this before.
> The user is not always the owner.
> This is clearest in the theft case.
> It's also a factor when you might want to give phones to employees or
> If I own the phone, I want the freedom to lock it down so hard that I
> can't get back into it with the debug board if I forget the
> And yes, this does imply some things - kernel preventing all access to
> the NAND from all but the root user, DFU/u-boot supporting
> password/passphrase/signed updates, and hardware support.
> Personally, I don't want a back door into the hardware where if someone
> has my phone for 30s, and a properly prepared laptop, they can boot an
> image from RAM with DFU, and install keyloggers/...
> OpenMoko community mailing list
> community at lists.openmoko.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the community