Smart LCD birght/dim...
keep.brain.from.freezing at gmail.com
Sun Apr 13 15:47:28 CEST 2008
On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 14:38 +0100, ewanm89 wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 02:50:11 +0200
> "Marco Trevisan (Treviño)" <mail at 3v1n0.net> wrote:
> > Since Freerunner won't have an hardware light sensor to set its LCD
> > brightness, I got some ideas about smartly changing the luminance of
> > the GTA02 screen to save its battery (still with an unknown life
> > time :/). Of course they aren't and never will be precise as an
> > hardware sensor is, but it's the only thing we have:
> > 1) Setting the brightness following the hour of the day: also if the
> > phone can't know if it's sunny or cloudy, neither if you're indoor or
> > outdoor, it's clear that just knowing the hour of the day, the date
> > and your latitude (to be set once via GPS) the phone can easily know
> > when the sun will rise and set, and so it will be possible increasing
> > or reducing the LCD brightness.
> > Also if you're indoor, I guess that when the sun is "gone" you won't
> > need so much luminance...
> > 2) Using personal profiles that follow your habits: you could define,
> > for each hour of each week day the "presumed" luminance, using
> > something like a calendar. I mean, if on working-days I generally
> > stay indoor every day from 8:30 to 13:00 and from 15:00 to the 19:00
> > I figure that on these intervals I don't need all the LCD power, so
> > I'll set in my "calendar" that on such interval I'll be indoor...
> > I guess that many of you would follow a routine durning the week, why
> > don't educate your phone for it!?
> > 3) Setting the luminance following the weather. Of course I've no
> > light sensors, neither a barometer :P, but if I've a working
> > connection available I could use the weather data downloaded every
> > few minutes (60, for example) from internet to change my screen
> > brightness (of course merging these informations with points 1 and 2)
> > What do you think about them?
> > I do think that they are really simple to implement, and that also if
> > they won't guarantee a perferct result, they could be a "smart"
> > workaround.
> GPS signal drops in cloudy conditions, and is usually non-existent
> indoors... this just leaves the 24hour cycle of the spin of the earth
> to worry about, all we need know is position, and rise/set times to
> sort that problem?
These all sound like rather extravagant power-saving means that would be
unlikely to save a great deal of power. It's maybe worth implementing if
someone has the time to add this neat little power-saving feature, as
part of power management - but it would be my guess that more battery
power could be saved by simple things like turning off GPRS when it is
not in use.
More information about the community