WSOD

Andy Green andy at openmoko.com
Fri Dec 19 01:18:56 CET 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Andy Green <andy at openmoko.com> wrote:
|> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
|>
|> | kernel -
2.6.24+r10.1+gitrf5b973489beb1a1239dfad53e3ad6e36ff7ee958-r10.1
|> |
|> | /proc/version is:
|> |
|> | Linux version 2.6.24 (slug at builder) (gcc version 4.1.2) #1 PREEMPT Fri
|> | Oct 17 17:20:36 UTC 2008
|>
|> Yow it's from Oct 17... it has Harald's patches but not Nicolas'
|> fixes... ancient kernel alert.  Kernel from that vintage is expected to
|> WSOD all over the place.
|
| can i change one of the opkg conf files to get a newer kernel to test
with?
|
| after more testing i found that i can only get the wsod to clear up if
| i bring the unit back from blanking quickly on the second blank.  if i
| wait longer than a couple minutes or so, i get the wsod again.  is any
| of this information useful or should i try everything again with a
| newer kernel?

I think it's just suffering for you at this point.

I updated the http://people.openmoko.org/andy with current
andy-tracking, you can give that a try.

- -Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAklK6HAACgkQOjLpvpq7dMrcDACgicsUP5XJmpad3LYIOb7bDiPj
gBUAn1aHOmojlmG4QDF/9wVz2QFmUHHg
=bNGt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the community mailing list