GTA02 Battery Capacity (Was: Re: More about the GTA02)
robin.paulson at gmail.com
Thu Feb 14 20:53:28 CET 2008
On 14/02/2008, Michael Shiloh <michael at openmoko.org> wrote:
> Thanks Kyle for a great summary of the work being discussed on the
> kernel ML. I am simply not able to keep up with all the lists and very
> much appreciate your helping out here.
indeed, thanks for the info kyle.
i've been avidly following the dev cycle of the software/hardware
here, and it's good to see some technical info from the kernel ML, 95%
of which is over my head
would it be possible for someone - michael, kyle? - to give an update
on this kind of info on a regular basis? i'm sure there are plenty of
others eager for technical progress, but who are unlikely to venture
on the kernel list?
> Kyle Bassett wrote:
> > I have been following the "Suspended Mode" thread in the kernel ML and
> > they have made amazing progress within the last week. As GTA02A5
> > currently stands, a "cold" suspend mode (just GSM in standby awaiting
> > incoming call/sms), could result in >20 days of standby!
> > For those technical people on this list, they have gotten GTA02A5 in
> > suspend using ~2.07mA @ 3.7v (fully charged batt). If the GTA02 will
> > have a 1200mAh battery, that's ~24 days of suspend runtime in a perfect
> > world. The goal is set around 1mA-2mA of suspend current draw, with
> > best case scenario suspend time of ~50 days (sure beats 4 hours... :-P
> > ). There are also issues such as internal battery discharge, ~30% over
> > 90 days for one of the packs that is being considered, which will reduce
> > the final suspend runtime available.
> > Currently, work continues attempting to shave even more power
> > consumption from a sleeping Freerunner. Individual power consumption of
> > the different internal devices is still taking place, that way any user
> > can approximate their battery lifetime (but each internal device has a
> > few different states, making this a tedious task). In the very near
> > future, we should see some numbers coming in about the "talk" runtime,
> > once some GSM power state issues are resolved.
> > There is talk about pushing startup power control of the internal
> > devices (wifi, bt, gps, mmc, etc.) to user level, as every user may or
> > may not want certain devices available at bootup/all the time
> > (availability vs. duration).
More information about the community