atomic clock / radio-receiver chip
Arne Kristian Jansen
arne.kristian.jansen at gmail.com
Mon Jun 2 08:10:16 CEST 2008
Federico Lorenzi skrev:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Ilja O. <vrghost at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 9:26 PM, cdr <_ at whats-your.name> wrote:
>>>> And portable thermonuclear bomb. Just in case. (Well, phone is already
>>>> hand interface to several orbital atomic clocks, isn't it?)
>>> the atomic clock(s) arent orbiting the earth,
>> But why there are no clocks at the orbit? They could be useful enough.
>> E.g. if there are several of them each on predefined geostationary
>> orbit we could do lots of useful things with them! For example, we
>> could prove that general relativity indeed exists (although ionosphere
>> would likely to spoil party at some degree).
> Huh, I'm a little confused about whats being spoken about here, but
> the GPS satellites are effectively giant orbiting atomic clocks, its
> the basis of GPS.
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community at lists.openmoko.org
Indeed they are:
(under Simplified method of operation).
And if the satellites did not take the relativity theory into account,
they would be useless. The accuracy would be awful.
More information about the community