QVGA V/s VGA for GTA03 (was something about yummy CPU-GPU combos!)

Dotan Cohen dotancohen at gmail.com
Tue Jun 10 15:03:28 CEST 2008

2008/6/10 The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <raster at openmoko.org>:
> what people have been saying here is that they have excellent eyesight and can
> see a tin 2.8" vga screen well enough to make use of it. like really see the
> difference and be able to do things with that res that would be not possible,
> impractical or painful otherwise. i've fairly amazed at the number of people
> saying their eyesight is so good as it is in stark contrast to my experience
> over the years, but ok - i'll take it for what it is. i didn't know how many
> people really could see the difference AND make use of it. i'm surprised.

I personally _don't_ have that great eyesight, yet I find the
difference between my VGA x50v and the QGVA x50 so substantial that I
would not even consider buying the QVGA machine even if it were the
only option. I'm nearsighted, though, and farsighted people may have
different experience.

Dotan Cohen


A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

More information about the community mailing list