G3. Was: GTA03: New case? Bigger screen!
linux.luser at myrealbox.com
Sun Jun 15 21:14:37 CEST 2008
On 15 Jun 2008, at 05:54, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Or maybe I am just ignorant. Can you do sending
> and receiving email and so on with GSM, or is that 3G only?
GSM is fine for this.
> I'd really rather buy a Freerunner, but at the moment I'm not sure
> to do. I currently have a Nokia 3210 that spends most of it's time
> turned off and forgotten, and a Palm Zire 21 that gets wiped if the
> Nokia does something wrong (apparently not shielded that well). I'd
> to replace them both by one thing, and I want that one thing to be
> based and open source. At the same time, though, I want it to be
> for a long time. 3G seems to me ignorant mind to fit that bill better
> than GSM.
I'm not sure what the big deal is with 3G.
My misconception was that GSM was only "dial-up speed", but someone
recently posted here stating otherwise. Someone debated with him over
his terming GSM as having "ADSL speed", but if it's 2 or 3 times
faster than 56k then that's fine by me. I can do all my email &
websurfing quite happily at that speed, and since my current 3G
mobile is painfully slow when coverage is spotty I can't see that it
makes much difference.
As I understand it GSM *does* allow you to make a digital data
connection, and that's the important thing.
More information about the community