GTA01 Gllin ipkg

jonathan spooner jonathan at topnoc.co.uk
Sat Jun 28 13:46:46 CEST 2008 

Did you download it then scp it to the gta01?  If you used wget on the 
gta01 you have not got the file, only the agreement webpage.  The file 
should be 1.9MB in size.

BTW I got the file and opkg still will not install it, reports error 4.

Regards,

Jon


Dan Staley wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I recently got my GTA01 and am trying to get the gllin ipkg from
> http://3rdparty.downloads.openmoko.org/gllin/ . However, everytime I
> download it, it says it is corrupted.  Does anyone know another place I
> can try to download it?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 15:58 -0500, community-request at lists.openmoko.org
> wrote:
>> Send community mailing list submissions to
>>         community at lists.openmoko.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>         http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>         community-request at lists.openmoko.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>         community-owner at lists.openmoko.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of community digest..."
>> email message attachment
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> From: fredthecat <fredthecat at blueyonder.co.uk>
>>> Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
>>> <community at lists.openmoko.org>
>>> To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
>>> <community at lists.openmoko.org>
>>> Subject: Exit of OpenMoko Window System
>>> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:02:11 -0500
>>>
>>> Dear All
>>>
>>> I was playing around with a fully emulated QEMU OpenMoko system (from a
>>> built system using MokoMakefile as
>>> documented in the Wiki), and at one point I hit the space bar (it the
>>> emulated Linux OpenMoko system received the
>>> keypress).
>>>
>>> When I did this, it exited the windows system (as if it had crashed or
>>> just plain died), but dropped me to a command
>>> line login ... and I could happily login as root and use regular commands.
>>>
>>> My question is this:  did I hit a but and crash the UI, or did I hit
>>> some magic (to me) sequence that is intended to exit the UI?
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> email message attachment
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> From: Ron K. Jeffries <rjeffries at gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
>>> <community at lists.openmoko.org>
>>> To: community at lists.openmoko.org <community at lists.openmoko.org>
>>> Subject: LiMo article in Washington Post
>>> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:46:57 -0500
>>>
>>> Informative article about LiMO in the Washington Post:
>>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/14/AR2008021401518.html?wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter
>>>
>>> It may require site registration, but it is a very light-weight approach.
>>>
>>> I am interested in understanding LimO and how it does or does not
>>> relate to Open Moko.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> --
>>> Ron K. Jeffries
>>> http://blog.eronj.com
>>>
>>>
>> email message attachment
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> From: Robin Paulson <robin.paulson at gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
>>> <community at lists.openmoko.org>
>>> To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
>>> <community at lists.openmoko.org>
>>> Subject: Re: GTA02 Battery Capacity (Was: Re: More about the GTA02)
>>> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:53:28 -0500
>>>
>>> On 14/02/2008, Michael Shiloh <michael at openmoko.org> wrote:
>>>> Thanks Kyle for a great summary of the work being discussed on the
>>>>  kernel ML. I am simply not able to keep up with all the lists and very
>>>>  much appreciate your helping out here.
>>>>
>>>>  Michael
>>> indeed, thanks for the info kyle.
>>>
>>> i've been avidly following the dev cycle of the software/hardware
>>> here, and it's good to see some technical info from the kernel ML, 95%
>>> of which is over my head
>>>
>>> would it be possible for someone - michael, kyle? - to give an update
>>> on this kind of info on a regular basis? i'm sure there are plenty of
>>> others eager for technical progress, but who are unlikely to venture
>>> on the kernel list?
>>>
>>>
>>>>  Kyle Bassett wrote:
>>>>  > I have been following the "Suspended Mode" thread in the kernel ML and
>>>>  > they have made amazing progress within the last week.  As GTA02A5
>>>>  > currently stands, a "cold" suspend mode (just GSM in standby awaiting
>>>>  > incoming call/sms), could result in >20 days of standby!
>>>>  >
>>>>  > For those technical people on this list, they have gotten GTA02A5 in
>>>>  > suspend using ~2.07mA @ 3.7v (fully charged batt).  If the GTA02 will
>>>>  > have a 1200mAh battery, that's ~24 days of suspend runtime in a perfect
>>>>  > world.  The goal is set around 1mA-2mA of suspend current draw, with
>>>>  > best case scenario suspend time of ~50 days (sure beats 4 hours... :-P
>>>>  > ).  There are also issues such as internal battery discharge, ~30% over
>>>>  > 90 days for one of the packs that is being considered, which will reduce
>>>>  > the final suspend runtime available.
>>>>  >
>>>>  > Currently, work continues attempting to shave even more power
>>>>  > consumption from a sleeping Freerunner.  Individual power consumption of
>>>>  > the different internal devices is still taking place, that way any user
>>>>  > can approximate their battery lifetime (but each internal device has a
>>>>  > few different states, making this a tedious task).  In the very near
>>>>  > future, we should see some numbers coming in about the "talk" runtime,
>>>>  > once some GSM power state issues are resolved.
>>>>  >
>>>>  > There is talk about pushing startup power control of the internal
>>>>  > devices (wifi, bt, gps, mmc, etc.) to user level, as every user may or
>>>>  > may not want certain devices available at bootup/all the time
>>>>  > (availability vs. duration).
>>>
>> email message attachment
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> From: JW <jameswillmer at yahoo.com>
>>> Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
>>> <community at lists.openmoko.org>
>>> To: community at lists.openmoko.org <community at lists.openmoko.org>
>>> Subject: topic for next community update [was Community Update Wed
>>> Feb 13 2008]
>>> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:10:27 -0500
>>>
>>> Michael Shiloh <michael at ...> writes:
>>>
>>> Hi Michael
>>>
>>> Thanks for the update - here are some questions for the next one in a couple of
>>> weeks .... all just to keep the community amused til the _great day_ arrives....
>>> and not more important than the internal work of you and the OpenMoko team...
>>>
>>> 1) General information about the Neo FreeRunner graphics capabilities.  This
>>> follows some comments I saw by raster and others in the IRC channel that there
>>> were some limiting issues.     What is the comparison to Neo1973 gfx?   This may
>>> relate to what target market you are going after for FreeRunner.
>>>
>>> 2) What is OpenMoko's plan to release FreeRunner
>>> i) release when hardware and kernel are solid and before application software is
>>> polished.   Community helps to polish software prior to full launch to "basic
>>> end users"
>>> ii) release when both hardware and software are polished.  Will take a little
>>> longer but will impress journalists more...
>>>
>>> 3) What does Sean think of the numbers here! :-)
>>> http://openmoko.hobby-site.com/
>>>
>>> JW
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> email message attachment
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> From: Marc-Olivier Barre <marco at marcochapeau.org>
>>> Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
>>> <community at lists.openmoko.org>
>>> To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
>>> <community at lists.openmoko.org>
>>> Subject: Re: topic for next community update [was Community Update
>>> Wed Feb 13 2008]
>>> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:25:00 -0500
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:10 PM, JW <jameswillmer at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Michael Shiloh <michael at ...> writes:
>>>>
>>>>  Hi Michael
>>>>
>>>>  Thanks for the update - here are some questions for the next one in a couple of
>>>>  weeks .... all just to keep the community amused til the _great day_ arrives....
>>>>  and not more important than the internal work of you and the OpenMoko team...
>>>>
>>>>  1) General information about the Neo FreeRunner graphics capabilities.  This
>>>>  follows some comments I saw by raster and others in the IRC channel that there
>>>>  were some limiting issues.     What is the comparison to Neo1973 gfx?   This may
>>>>  relate to what target market you are going after for FreeRunner.
>>> This might be of interest :
>>> http://dodji.blogspot.com/2008/02/xglamo-x-server-of-neo-gta02-device.html
>>> __________________
>>> Marc-Olivier Barre,
>>> MarcO'Chapeau.
>>>
>>>
>> email message attachment
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> From: Steven ** <montgoss+openmokocommunity at gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
>>> <community at lists.openmoko.org>
>>> To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
>>> <community at lists.openmoko.org>
>>> Subject: Re: topic for next community update [was Community Update
>>> Wed Feb 13 2008]
>>> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:42:38 -0500
>>>
>>> It's always been option i.  Hence the release of GTA01.  Many apps on
>>> that are still not polished.
>>>
>>> It'll be many months after the release of the Freerunner before the
>>> phones are ready for "basic end users".
>>>
>>> -Steven
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 2:10 PM, JW <jameswillmer at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>  2) What is OpenMoko's plan to release FreeRunner
>>>>  i) release when hardware and kernel are solid and before application software is
>>>>  polished.   Community helps to polish software prior to full launch to "basic
>>>>  end users"
>>>>  ii) release when both hardware and software are polished.  Will take a little
>>>>  longer but will impress journalists more...
>>>
>> email message attachment
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> From: Steven ** <montgoss+openmokocommunity at gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
>>> <community at lists.openmoko.org>
>>> To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
>>> <community at lists.openmoko.org>
>>> Subject: Re: LiMo article in Washington Post
>>> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:55:12 -0500
>>>
>>> The article says "Anyone hoping to create new applications for
>>> competing proprietary programs from Microsoft Corp., Palm Inc.,
>>> Research in Motion Ltd. or Nokia Corp.'s Symbian must pay licensing
>>> fees."
>>> So, I'd say it doesn't relate to OpenMoko.  OpenMoko is truly an open
>>> platform that you can develop for without restrictions and without
>>> paying anything.  "LiMo" seems to me to be some big companies grabbing
>>> on to what they believe to be this great new buzz-word:  Linux.
>>>
>>> -Steven
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Ron K. Jeffries <rjeffries at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Informative article about LiMO in the Washington Post:
>>>>  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/14/AR2008021401518.html?wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter
>>>>
>>>>  It may require site registration, but it is a very light-weight approach.
>>>>
>>>>  I am interested in understanding LimO and how it does or does not
>>>>  relate to Open Moko.
>>>>
>>>>  thanks
>>>>  --
>>>>  Ron K. Jeffries
>>>>  http://blog.eronj.com
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>  OpenMoko community mailing list
>>>>  community at lists.openmoko.org
>>>>  http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>>>>
>>>
>> email message attachment
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> From: Ortwin Regel <ortwin at gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
>>> <community at lists.openmoko.org>
>>> To: List for OpenMoko community discussion
>>> <community at lists.openmoko.org>
>>> Subject: Re: GTA02 Battery Capacity (Was: Re: More about the GTA02)
>>> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:58:07 -0500
>>>
>>> Can GTA01 users upgrade to this battery and would it make sense to do so?
>>>
>>> Ortwin
>>>
>>> On 2/14/08, Wolfgang Spraul <wolfgang at openmoko.com> wrote:
>>>> Andy -
>>>>
>>>>> class to expose it so it is generic. (I don't know for sure if it
>>>>> will
>>>>> ship with such a battery since it is decided in .tw according to
>>>>> availability and so on, but I hope it will.)
>>>> Yes, I think we can confirm that every GTA02 will ship with this new
>>>> 'smart' battery.
>>>> There are more steps to go through internally, related to
>>>> certification, some sort of calibration. Tony, do you know more details?
>>>> The cell's capacity will increase slightly to 1250 mAh (before was
>>>> 1200 mAh).
>>>> I am trying to release the schematics for the small PCB inside the
>>>> smart battery as well, will be posted to the wiki.
>>>>
>>>> Wolfgang
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 15, 2008, at 12:43 AM, Andy Green wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>>>>> On Thursday, Feb 14, 2008, "Kyle Bassett" writes:
>>>>>>> There is talk about pushing startup power control of the internal
>>>>>>> devices
>>>>>>> (wifi, bt, gps, mmc, etc.) to user level, as every user may or may
>>>>>>> not want
>>>>>>> certain devices available at bootup/all the time (availability vs.
>>>>>>> duration).
>>>>>> Indeed, this along with good realtime stats on power usage and
>>>>>> current
>>>>>> battery level would let people have reasonably accurate predictions
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> their battery life. It'd be interesting (to me at least) to turn
>>>>>> on and off the various peripherals and watch my projected battery
>>>>>> life
>>>>>> go up and down accordingly.
>>>>> GTA02 is capable to dialogue with a "smart battery" that will allow
>>>>> you
>>>>> to see the battery actual voltage and current flow (together: actual
>>>>> power) in uA down /sys in realtime, it uses the linux "Power Supply"
>>>>> class to expose it so it is generic. (I don't know for sure if it
>>>>> will
>>>>> ship with such a battery since it is decided in .tw according to
>>>>> availability and so on, but I hope it will.)
>>>>>
>>>>> The battery itself learns its cell performance over load and also
>>>>> makes
>>>>> available its "time to full/empty" estimate down /sys as well in
>>>>> seconds. You can see what data is available here:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/bq27000
>>>>>
>>>>> You can see stuff like this
>>>>>
>>>>> for i in capacity charge_full current_now present status technology
>>>>> temp
>>>>> time_to_empty_now time_to_full_now type voltage_now ; do echo -n "$i
>>>>> " ; cat /sys/devices/platform/bq27000-battery.0/power_supply/bat/
>>>>> $i ; done
>>>>>
>>>>> capacity 0
>>>>> charge_full 1215585
>>>>> current_now 183375
>>>>> present 1
>>>>> status Discharging
>>>>> technology Li-ion
>>>>> temp 276
>>>>> time_to_empty_now 0
>>>>> time_to_full_now 3932100
>>>>> type Battery
>>>>> voltage_now 2761000
>>>>>
>>>>> - -Andy
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
>>>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>>>>>
>>>>> iD8DBQFHtG+yOjLpvpq7dMoRAq2TAJoCYOC+PD3gj/jRMpOPnBL5MZJkzQCfTJn4
>>>>> 9ebCrbNjtGtDMBsJuUXZ8HY=
>>>>> =ANtG
>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OpenMoko community mailing list
>>>>> community at lists.openmoko.org
>>>>> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OpenMoko community mailing list
>>>> community at lists.openmoko.org
>>>> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenMoko community mailing list
> community at lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

More information about the community mailing list