Errr... 3d status?

Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) raster at
Thu May 8 10:44:11 CEST 2008

On Thu, 08 May 2008 10:23:30 +0200 "Pietro \"m0nt0\" Montorfano"
<monto84 at> babbled:

> Well, i don't want to make any flame/spam/anything-like-that, just a 
> question to clarify how is the situation. Well, on the neo freerunner 
> there will be the 3d capable chip which has its spec under NDA so it's 
> impossible for anyone not in the OM company to implement the 3d driver 
> and API right?
> If so, in OM there will be someone which will ever implement this driver?
> If not is there anyone out there which want to do that?
> If so is it possible to make this incredible person part of OM to get 
> around the NDA?
> Last but not least, the company which is making the 3d chip can be 
> persuaded in some manner to release the documentation about that chip (i 
> was thinking about anyone interested in the freerunner can write a 
> personal email to the company asking this...)?
> There will be a hope that one day the freerunner will have 3d capabilities?

nothing has changed here. the situation is as it was. nda needed for specs. 3d
not worth the effort needed to write the driver considering 2d is still not
anywhere as good as it should be. 

Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <raster at>

More information about the community mailing list