Meta Toolchain Release (2008 May)
Andy Green
andy at openmoko.com
Wed May 28 23:10:31 CEST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| | What we need is to enable to install these into the toolchain somehow,
| | rather than make that a special "do it at the factory" operation
| to get
| | things into toolchain.
| |
| |> Agreed, but till that time if anyone is interested in the toolchain I
| |> can put it up somewhere.
|
| Hey good job Pranav.
|
| After 7 months of proposing this methodology I finally get a taker --
| from outside OM. Maybe in another 7 months we can get a host-side opkg
|
|> Hmm, so within OM you guys don't prefer/advise using pre-built
|> toolchains? Any particular reason?
Open Embedded is the basis for current OM build system, it has a
Gentoo-type build-it-all-from-scratch approach. It wanted to build over
1,100 packages when I tried to use it to compile ONE package, many of
these packages were built for host. It was unable to build its thousand
packages of fun on Fedora 9 so I was unable to use it -- at all.
In fact all of the target packages it wanted to compile were sitting
there already compiled in the distribution packages, it did not need to
do any of it. All it needed was to use the prebuilt toolchain like you
did, and unpack existing target packages and their -dev into the host
like you did, and I would have been away.
|> For me, it seems too tedious to setup the OM dev env to build single app
|> like the dialer or some other app like squid-cache. I think the
|> toolchain is very useful, especially for small apps, test programs or
|> even OM apps, which just needs a small personalized modification.
|> Anyway, thats just my thought.
Totally agree. But more so: it should be the basis of our offering to
devs. Vast bulk of potential devs only want to recompile THEIR package
and just link against distro packages, or cherrypick one distro app to
modify. Package-based toolchain is the perfect, lean basis for this.
- -Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkg9ykcACgkQOjLpvpq7dMq5CwCdElyVA8nl1EzU5PWAh6mBv0LL
k0wAnRCqVcySdczXSdhvN9avDtOe3LYq
=76MD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the community
mailing list