Survey about the Touchscreen
don.juanton at gmail.com
Fri Nov 21 17:13:50 CET 2008
To just view the current standings in the poll:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <rms at 1407.org>wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 04:51:07PM +0100, Damien Thébault wrote:
> > 2008/11/21 Al Iasid <aliasid at gmail.com>:
> > > IMHO having to dig out a stylus (pen) or use my fingernail is not
> nearly as
> > > convenient or enjoyable as a finger-friendly interface. I don't min hi
> > > or low res - or big or small screen size - as long as the interface is
> > > finger-friendly. The cell phone is our most "intimate" personal device.
> > > There should be no intermediary in the user interface.
> > I don't really care about using my fingernails, they are always
> available, but
> > I don't like to use a stylus since I have to find it in the first place.
> > (maybe if the stylus was hidden in the case it would be a little better,
> > this uses space and it takes more time than fingernails)
> > The primary isses I have with the actual touchscreen is the UI
> > I don't know if it's because the touchscreen is slow or because the
> software is.
> > I agree that a borderless phone would be more practical touchscreen-wise.
> > If this implies using a hard screen, implying capacitive, then why not.
> If you try out sketch, you see that it's responsive enough and detailed
> enough for making a written signature :)
> Grudnuk demand sustenance!
> Today is Setting Orange, the 33rd day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3174
> + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
> + Whatever you do will be insignificant,
> | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
> + So let's do it...?
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community at lists.openmoko.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the community