Back to the basics: improving user experience

Christian Weßel wesselch at
Thu Oct 16 20:01:50 CEST 2008

Am Donnerstag, den 16.10.2008, 18:20 +0200 schrieb Paul:
> Vasco Névoa wrote:
> > I can see there are at least 2 distinct types of user of OM:
> > A - "I need a working phone now, the uber-cool PDA stuff can wait";
> > B - "OM is a groundbreaking project, I don't care about telephony,  
> > let's press the revolution!"
> > As much as I am divided among the two views, I think OM must oblige to  
> > its responsibility towards the users who have paid for their hardware,  
> > and keep its promise of a working phone.
> >   
> I agree. Having a solid functional phone is the prime objective.
> Paul
I agree too. With high priority the phone/sms functinality should fixed
and maybe enhanced and afterwards the PC functions could be performed.

But the terminal appl. should be availible all time, because FR is still
a computer with a GSM module and sometimes I need the terminal to
check/fix/calibrate the phone/PC.

mfg/br, christian

Flurstraße 14
29640 Schneverdingen

E-Mail: wesselch at
Telefon: +49 5193 97 14 95
Mobile:  +49 171 357 59 57
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : 

More information about the community mailing list