Android open sourced

Previdi Roberto previdi.roberto at gmail.com
Wed Oct 22 19:13:25 CEST 2008


my 2 cents: if the porting of android will need the intervention of the low
level developers this shouldn't be done. the kernel coders need all the time
they need to understand and optimize the low level code. if meanwhile there
are other developers who feel they can handle the port it could be just
another option, and would be wrong not to try it..

On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Nicola Mfb <nicola.mfb at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2008/10/22 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <rms at 1407.org>
>
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 03:23:56PM -0700, Jim Morris wrote:
>> > No magic, I suspect the kernel will be the same, and have potentially
>> the same bugs, however I think
>> > the apps will be more stable.
>>
>
> Exactly! this is a tipical  scenario showing why openmoko inc. should spend
> the big part of it's resources on the kernel.
> All the above, 2008.x, fso, qtopia, and now android will depend on it.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/attachments/20081022/c2ed8665/attachment-0002.htm 


More information about the community mailing list