Has anyone tried Qi?

Pander pander at users.sourceforge.net
Fri Oct 31 06:14:08 CET 2008

Does Qi have an issue tracker or does an existing issue tracker have a
label or a component to track Qi issues?

Petr Vanek wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:35:40 +0100
> Petr Vanek <vanous at penguin.cz> (PV) wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:26:00 +0100
>> "arne anka" <openmoko at ginguppin.de> (AA)
>> wrote:
>>>> I have tried it and i liked it. It was definitively faster. I might
>>>> stick with it for a while i hope.
>>> how does it play with the dead battery issue?
>> well, this i cannot answer as i have three batteries and just swap them
>> around... i can try to run one completely empty and see what happens.
> seems like no luck with empty battery, but i hadn't have much time to
> test. and, for some reason, i cannot Qi boot my SD located distro.
> Results on NAND based distro give me today the same or almost longer
> booting times. The original Qi from Andy was definitely faster.
> Someone mentioned sound issue... right, seems to be that way too - no
> sound, but i haven't tested it thoroughly now.
> I had been using older qi from Andy and i am not sure, but think that
> it didn't suffer these issues... well, let's wait, it's still fresh.
> --
> Petr Vaněk
> http://biodynamika.cz
> _______________________________________________
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community at lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

More information about the community mailing list