specific absorption rate

roguemoko at roguewrt.org roguemoko at roguewrt.org
Thu Sep 4 04:26:04 CEST 2008

Cédric Berger wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 01:20, Sarton O'Brien <roguemoko at roguewrt.org> wrote:
>> That assumes the ear piece is the antenna. Not always the case. In the case of
>> the FR, I don't know if this is the case or not.
> the GSM antenna for the Neo is at the bottom (under the mic, not the speaker).
> So it is a little less close to your head. And it must also have been
> taken in account in SAR values -radiations are measured in normal
> operations, phone put near the head-

Yes, my understanding is that a headset has always been the primary way 
to reduce exposure. The only time I've heard of a headset acting as an 
antenna is with an am/fm radio.

I was mainly pointing out that I don't know if the FR or any mobile 
in-fact would use the headset as an antenna. I doubt it.


More information about the community mailing list