fso bug/oddity

Rod Whitby rod at whitby.id.au
Thu Sep 18 02:20:04 CEST 2008

Tilman Baumann wrote:
> And for the wakeup stuff. Well besides at there is not much of a stable 
> interface i guess, besides some acpi and nvram cruft.
> I guess a dbus interface suits well for that. But needs to be more 
> abstract (register timer for callback/signal, remove timer). :)
> But somehow i can't get the at command out of my head...

I would hope that framework services like registering a wakeup would not 
require the overhead of starting a shell to run an 'at' command :-)

-- Rod

More information about the community mailing list