2008.9 Basic questions
Nishit Dave
stargazer.dave at gmail.com
Sat Sep 20 13:37:56 CEST 2008
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Nishit Dave <stargazer.dave at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Fox Mulder <Quakeman1 at gmx.net> wrote:
>
>> When i ordered the phone the reseller said on the website that the phone
>> isn't useable for daily use and is only for enthusiasts. And this
>> information was everywhere in the net even at july when i ordered my
>> phone. So don't say you didn't noticed this when you ordered your phone.
>> Or did you just click-buy without researching anything about the things
>> you want to buy? ;)
>>
>>
> See: http://www.idasystems.net/ and http://www.idasystems.net/freerunner
>
> They have updated the website, raised the FR's price (because they didn't
> figure out octroi earlier?) but still no mention of it not being usable for
> daily use. In fact, when I bought it, they had a 30 day return policy,
> which I did not invoke, considering I should support the effort and trust
> Openmoko to deliver. Now they seem to have removed the return policy.
>
And by the way, what do Openmoko have to say about the FR?
http://www.openmoko.com/product.html#
The only (implied) warning one could have come across in the early days of
the launch was the *Community Portal*, which is the wiki, saying that this
was a developer release of the FR. So how many phone purchase decisions are
made on the basis of a *community portal's* hint, when the corporate and
reseller websites do not point out that it is an experimental device at all?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/attachments/20080920/c9bf6f8c/attachment.htm
More information about the community
mailing list