cellhunter --- the state of development and future

vale vales at gmx.de
Mon Apr 20 23:54:32 CEST 2009

yes i read your email,

but i think size matters ;) i prefer to get a less acurate position but 
get a position to beeing somewhere where we have no cells at all.

if we have a big database its not that difficult to implement a position 
query by cell ...

with cellhunter i think we have the main roads and cities covered in 
germany :)

best regards


Stefan Schmidt (via Nabble) schrieb:
> Hello.
> On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 05:05, vale wrote:
>  >
>  > why do we need so many databases doing the same?
>  >
>  > cellhunter has far more cells than openbmap, so why not just bundle the
>  > effort and only have one database for getting cells with openmoko?
> Seems you did not read my mail. To get the background you should also 
> have a
> look at the archive to find the previous desicussions about this.
> I ask for quality and willingness to expand the server side for better 
> results.
> regards
> Stefan Schmidt
> _______________________________________________
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community at ... 
> <http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2665694&i=0>
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email is a reply to your post @ 
> http://n2.nabble.com/cellhunter-----the-state-of-development-and-future-tp2657164p2665694.html
> You can reply by email or by visting the link above.

View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/cellhunter-----the-state-of-development-and-future-tp2657164p2666667.html
Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the community mailing list