e in framebuffer?

[Tilman Baumann]

c_c wrote:

>  The thought came from the fact that QTE seems faster. So, if X was
> removed
> from the equation - how would the freerunner perform?

I never felt a noticeable speed difference.

> with e providing a
> reasonable
> windowing environment,

Window management on plain framebuffer? Are you sure?
I would be very interested in learning more about this.
My expectation would be that you still need some fb multiplexer that needs
to be relatively smart.
Probably by rendering into a shared mem that gets composed to a fb frame
by some central daemon.

-- 
MFG
 Tilman Baumann