FSO Going Out of the Distro Business? - Questions

Nicola Mfb nicola.mfb at gmail.com
Wed Aug 5 13:48:10 CEST 2009


On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Laszlo
KREKACS<laszlo.krekacs.list at gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> Does that also need, that SHR tries to migrate to 2.6.30 kernel?
> Currently they are on 2.6.28.
>
> Im asking because 2.6.30 kernel should contain many improvements (dumb
> battery driver, glamo work, wifi improvement, gprs improvement, etc, etc),
> so it would make sense (to me at least) that FSO wants to test their
> framework against 2.6.30 kernel too.
>
> What is the plan? Because if fso is bundled to shr, that obviously means
> migrating to 2.6.30 depends upon shr decision.
>
> Or who should do that job (ie. migration)?

I'd like to know about xglamo too, AFAIK it's depcrecated.

     Nicola



More information about the community mailing list