FSO Going Out of the Distro Business? - Questions

Sebastian Krzyszkowiak seba.dos1 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 6 12:33:38 CEST 2009

On 8/6/09, Laszlo KREKACS <laszlo.krekacs.list at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Sebastian
> Krzyszkowiak<seba.dos1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 8/5/09, Laszlo KREKACS <laszlo.krekacs.list at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Does that also need, that SHR tries to migrate to 2.6.30 kernel?
>>> Currently they are on 2.6.28.
>> No, SHR is currently on 2.6.29 - it uses newest andy-tracking, so dumb
>> battery drivers and few other things are already in SHR.
> Whatever.
> 2.6.30 does not work out of box. And if SHR does not want to
> migrate over .30, FSO does not get tested against the newest kernel.
> There is a kernel development effort, so significant work has been put
> to merge upstream, so I think we should respect them and make
> the whole distribution work on the newest .30 kernel.
> I was only interested what is the current desire from SHR and FSO.
> Laszlo

When only 2.6.30/31 becames stable enough, I can't see why it
shouldn't be in shr-unstable.

Sebastian Krzyszkowiak

More information about the community mailing list