[OM2009t5]No suspend after ffalarms alarm

Paul Fertser fercerpav at gmail.com
Thu Aug 6 14:49:21 CEST 2009

Marcel <tanuva at googlemail.com> writes:
>> > That _normally_ works fine for me, too, only ffalarms screws
>> > suspending. There's indeed some more output about suspending, but I
>> > cannot find something useful in that messages... Only... What about
>> > line 36, it's changing the modem from "suspended" to "suspending",
>> > shouldn't it be some kind of "awake" before being "suspending"?
>> You might want to post your full log somewhere for more analysis.
> Oh dammit, I forgot to paste the link... >_<
> Here it is: http://pastebin.ca/1520436

This first "TIMEOUT 'AT+CTZU=0' => ???" already fucks up everything :(

AFAIK, FSO handling of such situations is not robust and moreover
there's even a known case where such a timeout will occur (iirc after
%CSQ unsol reply the modem can go to sleep immediately and so
frameworkd command can easily fail as it wakes up the modem explicitly
only after some time from the last communication passed).

Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software!
mailto:fercerpav at gmail.com

More information about the community mailing list