Rui Miguel Silva Seabra rms at
Thu Aug 27 11:58:35 CEST 2009

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:52:13AM +0200, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> I use OM2009T5, with OWrt state files and few SHR libraries. Why OM2009?
> Simply because it is much more stable than SHR-U. Now someone will start
> yelling "...but it is called unstable...". Fine, but SHR means "STABLE
> hybrid release" in first place. So i ask, where is this stability?
> 	I hate to say this, but in circumstances you are having new full time
> job, it might be worth to abandon OM2009. What to do on SHR? Definitely
> take care of _real_ testing branch which would be more stable. This way,
> some day maybe we will have SHR release which finally will be totally
> stable.

SHR-U from 2009/08/08 is more stable than Om2009t5 on my FreeRunner. I used
to have to reboot about once per day, but now days pass without a reboot
quite easily!


More information about the community mailing list