Marcel tanuva at
Thu Aug 27 16:05:52 CEST 2009

Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2009, 10:58 +0100 schrieb Rui Miguel Silva
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:52:13AM +0200, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> > I use OM2009T5, with OWrt state files and few SHR libraries. Why OM2009?
> > Simply because it is much more stable than SHR-U. Now someone will start
> > yelling "...but it is called unstable...". Fine, but SHR means "STABLE
> > hybrid release" in first place. So i ask, where is this stability?
> > 	I hate to say this, but in circumstances you are having new full time
> > job, it might be worth to abandon OM2009. What to do on SHR? Definitely
> > take care of _real_ testing branch which would be more stable. This way,
> > some day maybe we will have SHR release which finally will be totally
> > stable.
> SHR-U from 2009/08/08 is more stable than Om2009t5 on my FreeRunner. I used
> to have to reboot about once per day, but now days pass without a reboot
> quite easily!

"Days pass without a reboot quite easily" with 2009T5 here, but SHR-U
didn't even show the PIN entry screen twice...

More information about the community mailing list