Om2009

Marcel tanuva at googlemail.com
Thu Aug 27 16:49:41 CEST 2009


Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2009, 11:43 +0100 schrieb Rui Miguel Silva
Seabra:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 04:05:52PM +0200, Marcel wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2009, 10:58 +0100 schrieb Rui Miguel Silva
> > Seabra:
> > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:52:13AM +0200, Patryk Benderz wrote:
> > > > I use OM2009T5, with OWrt state files and few SHR libraries. Why OM2009?
> > > > Simply because it is much more stable than SHR-U. Now someone will start
> > > > yelling "...but it is called unstable...". Fine, but SHR means "STABLE
> > > > hybrid release" in first place. So i ask, where is this stability?
> > > > 	I hate to say this, but in circumstances you are having new full time
> > > > job, it might be worth to abandon OM2009. What to do on SHR? Definitely
> > > > take care of _real_ testing branch which would be more stable. This way,
> > > > some day maybe we will have SHR release which finally will be totally
> > > > stable.
> > > 
> > > SHR-U from 2009/08/08 is more stable than Om2009t5 on my FreeRunner. I used
> > > to have to reboot about once per day, but now days pass without a reboot
> > > quite easily!
> > 
> > "Days pass without a reboot quite easily" with 2009T5 here, but SHR-U
> > didn't even show the PIN entry screen twice...
> 
> Which SHR-U image? That is important, because U is for unstable, but sometimes
> it is stable (like 2009/08/08).

I don't remember exactly, was last Friday's image IIRC. Today afternoon
I need a working gps device, but I might retry SHR when Paroli is
working on it... Don't like the UI of the SHR tel apps. :)




More information about the community mailing list