Putting the *S*table back in *S*HR!
djdas at djdas.net
Thu Aug 27 17:52:47 CEST 2009
Warren Baird ha scritto:
> hey all,
> As I (and others) mentioned in the recent OM2009 thread - One of the
> great advantages of SHR is that it is being developed so quickly.
> However, I'd also say that one of the great *DIS*advantages of SHR is
> that it's being developed so quickly that it's often not very stable,
> and the 'testing' build is woefully out of date.
This is why I never used SHR (and I won't for many time to come, I
> I don't have very much spare time in my life right now, so I
> unfortunately can't take it on myself, but I think it'd be very
> beneficial if someone was willing to step up and take charge of
> getting shr-testing updated periodically, and maybe even releasing an
> shr-stable that has at least some of the snazzy stuff from shr-u in it.
Or rename it UHR (Unstable Hybrid Release) :P
More information about the community