QT goes LGPL

[Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller]

Well if you read your own link you would see that that RMS actually 
recommend the LGPL in cases like Qt, I quote:

"The most common case is when a free library's features are readily
available for proprietary software through other alternative libraries.
In that case, the library cannot give free software any particular
advantage, so it is better to use the Lesser GPL for that library."

I think it would be hard argue that a UI toolkit is not readily
available for proprietary software through other alternative libraries.

Christian


On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 17:20 +0200, Aapo Rantalainen wrote:
> Read what Richard Stallman/FSF says about LGPL:
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html
> 
> (But it is Nokias business what license they use)
> 
> -Aapo Rantalainen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community at lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community