Yaouh! out (update for tangogps maps)

[arne anka]

>> ext2/3 is not really suited to storing such a large number of small
>> files.

afaik ext3 can be configured to use small files.


>   (I don't understand why ext2/3 is used at all these days, as it has  
> been obsolete for years.

that's nonsense.

> Except for one bug 8 years ago[1], ReiserFS has worked flawlessly for me  
> on my desktop systems.)

i use ext2/3 for over ten years now and never had any problems.

if you like reiser better, it's ok, but please don't tell such nonsense  
only to justify your likings.
it's purely a matter of personal preferences, nothing more -- and least of  
all "extX is bad, reiser is good".