Is Israel a Democracy? -- The problem with intellectually insecure whites -- Should Christians Support Israeli Terrorism in Gaza?

[Marcel]

I highly doubt he himself sent that mail.

--
Marcel

Am Friday 23 January 2009 17:14:10 schrieb john dowd:
> And you think that this is an appropriate forum because.... why?
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
>
> <mickey at openmoko.org> wrote:
> > The Jewish State of Israel has no constitution, nor does it name its
> > borders. Israel's hidden constitution is Judaism. Israel's undeclared
> > borders range from the Nile to the Euphrates rivers. Israel's desired
> > jurisdiction extends over the entire Earth.
> >
> > It could not be more clear that the Jewish State follows a foreign policy
> > which obeys Jewish Law as iterated in the Hebrew Bible, the Talmud,
> > Maimonedes, the Cabalah, and the many commentaries and refinements of
> > same. The Jews are genociding the native inhabitants of Palestine, just
> > as their religion advises, and because their religion teaches them to do
> > so. They treat non-Jews as if non-humans, just as their religion requires
> > them to do. They make perpetual war on every nation on Earth, just as
> > their genocidal Jewish God has instructed.
> >
> > The Jews of Israel are simply being Jews. Jews are an existential threat
> > to the human race.
> >
> > Israel contains one third of the Jews of the World. It is not some
> > aberration of the Jewish spirit, but the condensation and concentration
> > of the perverse Jewish mentality, which malady also pervades the
> > remaining two thirds of Jewry, who almost unanimously support the Jewish
> > State, and who certainly do unanimously support the Jewish People and its
> > consistent and constant crimes against the human race. Israel is Jewry
> > and the danger of Israel is the danger of the Jewish People to all
> > others, as the Jews have demonstrated each and every day of their
> > existence.
> >
> > The Jews, the entire Jewish People of 15 million, will not relent until
> > they have wiped out all non-Jews in "Greater Israel". They will not stop
> > destroying all other cultures, nations, religions, ethnicities, races,
> > competition, etc. until they are either stopped, or succeed in their
> > ancient quest to destroy the human race.
> >
> > What Israel is doing is not some reaction to outside forces, nor was the
> > formation of Israel a response to the Holocaust. Israel is simply
> > following the plan laid out in the Jews' religious texts. The Jews have
> > openly planned to take Palestine and genocide the native population of
> > Palestine for some 2,500 years before the Holocaust. The Jews have openly
> > complained that "anti-Semitism" is a threat that gives them the right to
> > genocide the Palestinians, not merely since the advent of Nazism, but for
> > some 2,500 years.
> >
> > The Jewish religion is the Constitution of the Jewish State of Israel,
> > and, to a greater or lesser extent, the constitution of the nature of
> > every Jew alive. The borders of Israel are the range the Jew roams over
> > the entire World. The perverse Jewish mentality is inbred by a Jew's
> > exposure to his parents and to his community. Judaism passes in the spit
> > and slobber of Jewish mother telling her Jewish child that he is a "Jew",
> > as much as Judaism passes in the poison and pain of a Talmudic tractate.
> > The secular Jews did not suddenly come to life after the Enlightenment
> > and the Jewish Reformation a body of vampires that appeared ex nihilo, in
> > vacuo, mostly atheistical and undetached from formally practiced Judaism.
> > Judaism is the Jew. It is a mindset that transcends and supercedes
> > religion. It is a belief set, a way of life, a perception of one's self
> > and one's relation to the World that makes a Jew, a Jew, and a danger to
> > all of humanity.
> >
> > In fact, the religious shell of Judaism is like the stretched and
> > infected skin of a lycanthropic pustule. When you lance it to cure the
> > infection, the virus only becomes more contagious and spills directly on
> > the non-Jew.
> >
> > The secular Jew is a deliberate product of the hyper-religious Jew, a
> > monster created out of the hewed corpses of the fanatically religious
> > Jew, a Golem which is conjured up to enter the World of the non-Jew and
> > poison its blood, and boil its brain with a rabid lunacy that bites and
> > spreads, until the infected community feeds on itself and fills the
> > fields with rotting bloating bodies, where once human beings tilled the
> > soil and tended to their families. The religious Jew created the secular
> > Jew as an army of Esthers who seduce with open thighs, broad smiles, and
> > a Siren call that lures in the non-Jew to cast his skull upon the jagged
> > rocks and color the seas with his blood, sickened and blinded by the
> > venereal disease of Judaism in secular form.
> >
> > Israel is not a secular democracy. It is a religious mockery. It is a
> > rabid bat flying to the ends of the Earth, to end the Earth. No one will
> > be free nor safe until the disease is quarantined and dies out.
> >
> > Source:
> > http://www.ziopedia.org/articles/israel/how_can_israel_claim_to_be_a_%27d
> >emocracy%27_when_it_has_no_constitution_nor_borders?/`
> >
> > --------------------
> >
> > The problem with intellectually insecure whites
> >
> > Kevin MacDonald
> >
> > January 19, 2009
> >
> > America will soon have a white minority. This is a much desired state of
> > affairs for the hostile elites who hold political power and shape public
> > opinion. But it certainly creates some management issues — at least in
> > the long run. After all, it's difficult to come up with an historical
> > example of a nation with a solid ethnic majority (90% white in 1950) that
> > has voluntarily decided to cede political and cultural power. Such
> > transformations are typically accomplished by military invasions, great
> > battles, and untold suffering.
> >
> > And it's not as if everyone is doing it. Only Western nations view their
> > own demographic and cultural eclipse as a moral imperative. Indeed, as I
> > have noted previously, it is striking that racial nationalism has
> > triumphed in Israel at the same time that the Jewish intellectual and
> > political movements and the organized Jewish community have been the most
> > active and effective force for a non-white America. Indeed, a poll in
> > 2008 found that Avigdor Lieberman was the second most popular politician
> > in Israel. Lieberman has advocated expulsion of Arabs from Israel and has
> > declared himself a follower of Vladimir Jabotinsky, the leading pioneer
> > of racial Zionism. The most popular politician in the poll was Benjamin
> > Netanyahu — another admirer of Jabotinsky. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and
> > Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni are also Jabotinskyists.
> >
> > The racial Zionists are now carrying out yet another orgy of mass murder
> > after a starvation-inducing blockade and the usual triggering assault
> > designed to provoke Palestinian retaliation — which then becomes the
> > cover for claims that Israel is merely defending itself against
> > terrorism. This monstrosity was approved by overwhelming majorities of
> > both Houses of Congress. The craven Bush administration did its part by
> > abstaining from a UN resolution designed by the US Secretary of State as
> > a result of a personal appeal by the Israeli Prime Minister. This is yet
> > another accomplishment of the Israel Lobby, but one they would rather not
> > have discussed in public. People might get the impression that the Lobby
> > really does dictate US foreign policy in the Mideast. Obviously, such
> > thoughts are only entertained by anti-Semites.
> >
> > But I digress.
> >
> > In managing the eclipse of white America, one strategy of the mainstream
> > media is to simply ignore the issue. Christopher Donovan  ("For the
> > media, the less whites think about their coming minority status, the
> > better") has noted that the media, and in particular, the New York Times,
> > are quite uninterested in doing stories that discuss what white people
> > think about this state of affairs.
> >
> > It's not surprising that the New York Times — the Jewish-owned flagship
> > of anti-white, pro-multicultural media — ignores the issue. The issue is
> > also missing from so-called conservative media even though one would
> > think that conservatives would find the eclipse of white America to be an
> > important issue. Certainly, their audiences would find it interesting.
> >
> > Now we have an article "The End of White America" written by Hua Hsu, an
> > Assistant Professor of English at Vassar College. The article is a rather
> > depressing display of what passes for intellectual discourse on the most
> > important question confronting white people in America.
> >
> > Hsu begins by quoting a passage in F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby
> > in which a character, Tom Buchanan, states: "Have you read The Rise of
> > the Colored Empires by this man Goddard?" … Well, it's a fine book, and
> > everybody ought to read it. The idea is if we don't look out the white
> > race will be—will be utterly submerged. It's all scientific stuff; it's
> > been proved."
> >
> > Buchanan's comment is a thinly veiled reference to Lothrop Stoddard's The
> > Rising Tide of Color which Hsu describes as "rationalized hatred"
> > presented in a scholarly, gentlemanly, and scientific tone. (This wording
> > that will certainly help him when he comes up for tenure.) As Hsu notes,
> > Stoddard had a doctorate from Harvard and was a member of many academic
> > associations. His book was published by a major publisher. It was
> > therefore "precisely the kind of book that a 1920s man of Buchanan's
> > profile — wealthy, Ivy League–educated, at once pretentious and
> > intellectually insecure — might have been expected to bring up in casual
> > conversation."
> >
> > Let's ponder that a bit. The simple reality is that in the year 2009 an
> > Ivy League-educated person, "at once pretentious and intellectually
> > insecure,"  would just as glibly assert the same sort of nonsense as Hsu.
> > To wit:
> >
> > The coming white minority does not mean that the racial hierarchy of
> > American culture will suddenly become inverted, as in 1995's White Man's
> > Burden, an awful thought experiment of a film, starring John Travolta,
> > that envisions an upside-down world in which whites are subjugated to
> > their high-class black oppressors. There will be dislocations and
> > resentments along the way, but the demographic shifts of the next 40
> > years are likely to reduce the power of racial hierarchies over
> > everyone's lives, producing a culture that's more likely than any before
> > to treat its inhabitants as individuals, rather than members of a caste
> > or identity group.
> >
> > The fact is that no one can say for certain what multicultural America
> > without a white majority will be like. There is no scientific or
> > historical basis for claims like "the demographic shifts of the next 40
> > years are likely to reduce the power of racial hierarchies over
> > everyone's lives, producing a culture that's more likely than any before
> > to treat its inhabitants as individuals, rather than members of a caste
> > or identity group."
> >
> > Indeed, there is no evidence at all that we are proceeding to a color
> > blind future. The election results continue to show that white people are
> > coalescing in the Republican Party, while the Democrats are increasingly
> > the party of a non-white soon-to-be majority.
> >
> > Is it so hard to believe that when this coalition achieves a majority
> > that it will further compromise the interests of whites far beyond
> > contemporary concerns such as immigration policy and affirmative action?
> > Hsu anticipates a colorblind world, but affirmative action means that
> > blacks and other minorities are certainly not treated as individuals. And
> > it means that whites — especially white males — are losing out on
> > opportunities they would have had without these policies and without the
> > massive non-white immigration of the last few decades.
> >
> > Given the intractability of changing intelligence and other traits
> > required for success in the contemporary economy, it is unlikely that 40
> > more years of affirmative action will attain the outcomes desired by the
> > minority lobbies. Indeed, in Obama's America, blacks are rioting in
> > Oakland over perceived racial injustices, and from 2002–2007, black
> > juvenile homicide victims increased 31%, while black juvenile homicide
> > perpetrators increased 43%. Hence,  the reasonable outlook is for a
> > continuing need for affirmative action and for racial activism in these
> > groups, even after whites become a minority.
> >
> > Whites will also lose out because of large-scale importation of
> > relatively talented immigrants from East Asia. Indeed, as I noted over a
> > decade ago, "The United States is well on the road to being dominated by
> > an Asian technocratic elite and a Jewish business, professional, and
> > media elite."
> >
> > Hsu shows that there already is considerable anxiety among whites about
> > the future. An advertizing executive says, "I think white people feel
> > like they're under siege right now — like it's not okay to be white right
> > now, especially if you're a white male. ... People are stressed out about
> > it. 'We used to be in control! We're losing control'" Another says,
> > "There's a lot of fear and a lot of resentment."
> >
> > It's hard to see why these feelings won't increase in the future.
> >
> > A huge problem for white people is lack of intellectual and cultural
> > confidence. Hsu quotes Christian (Stuff White People Like) Lander saying,
> > "I get it: as a straight white male, I'm the worst thing on Earth." A
> > professor comments that for his students "to be white is to be culturally
> > broke. The classic thing white students say when you ask them to talk
> > about who they are is, 'I don't have a culture.' They might be
> > privileged, they might be loaded socioeconomically, but they feel
> > bankrupt when it comes to culture … They feel disadvantaged, and they
> > feel marginalized."
> >
> > This lack of cultural confidence is no accident. For nearly 100 years
> > whites have been subjected to a culture of critique emanating from the
> > most prestigious academic and media institutions. And, as Hsu points out,
> > the most vibrant and influential aspect of American popular culture is
> > hip-hop—a product of the African American urban culture.
> >
> > The only significant group of white people with any cultural confidence
> > centers itself around country music, NASCAR, and the small town values of
> > traditional white America. For this group of whites — and only this group
> > — there is  "a racial pride that dares not speak its name, and that
> > defines itself through cultural cues instead—a suspicion of intellectual
> > elites and city dwellers, a preference for folksiness and plainness of
> > speech (whether real or feigned), and the association of a working-class
> > white minority with 'the real America.'"
> >
> > This is what I term implicit whiteness — implicit because explicit
> > assertions of white identity have been banned by the anti-white elites
> > that dominate our politics and culture. It is a culture that, as Hsu
> > notes, "cannot speak its name."
> >
> > But that implies that the submerged white identity of the white working
> > class and the lack of cultural confidence exhibited by the rest of white
> > America are imposed from outside. Although there may well be
> > characteristics of whites that facilitate this process, this suppression
> > of white identity and interests is certainly not the natural outcome of
> > modernization or any other force internal to whites as a people. In my
> > opinion, it is the result of the successful erection of a culture of
> > critique in the West dominated by Jewish intellectual and political
> > movements.
> >
> > The result is that educated, intellectually insecure white people these
> > days are far more likely to believe in the utopian future described by
> > Hsu than in hard and cautious thinking about what the future might have
> > in store for them.
> >
> > It's worth dwelling a bit on the intellectual insecurity of the whites
> > who mindlessly utter the mantras of multiculturalism that they have
> > soaked up from the school system and from the media. Most people do not
> > have much confidence in their intellectual ability and look to elite
> > opinion to shape their beliefs. As I noted elsewhere,
> >
> > A critical component of the success of the culture of critique is that it
> > achieved control of the most prestigious and influential institutions of
> > the West, and it became a consensus among the elites, Jewish and
> > non-Jewish alike. Once this happened, it is not surprising that this
> > culture became widely accepted among people of very different levels of
> > education and among people of different social classes.
> >
> > Most people are quite insecure about their intellectual ability. But they
> > know that the professors at Harvard, and the editorial page of the New
> > York Times and the Washington Post, and even conservative commentators
> > like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity are all on page when it comes to
> > racial and ethnic issues. This is a formidable array, to the point that
> > you almost have to be a crank to dissent from this consensus.
> >
> > I think one of the greatest triumphs of the left has been to get people
> > to believe that people who assert white identity and interests or who
> > make unflattering portrayals of organized Jewish movements are morally
> > degenerate, stupid, and perhaps psychiatrically disturbed. Obviously, all
> > of these adjectives designate low status.
> >
> > The reality is that the multicultural emperor has no clothes and, because
> > of its support for racial Zionism and the racialism of ethnic minorities
> > in America, it is massively hypocritical to boot. The New York Times, the
> > academic left, and the faux conservatives that dominate elite discourse
> > on race and ethnicity are intellectually bankrupt and can only remain in
> > power by ruthlessly suppressing or ignoring the scientific findings.
> >
> > This is particularly a problem for college-educated whites. Like
> > Fitzgerald's Tom Buchanan, such people have a strong need to feel that
> > their ideas are respectable and part of the mainstream. But the
> > respectable mainstream gives them absolutely nothing with which to
> > validate themselves except perhaps the idea that the world will be a
> > better place when people like them no longer have power. Hsu quotes the
> > pathetic Christian Lander: ""Like, I'm aware of all the horrible crimes
> > that my demographic has done in the world. ... And there's a bunch of
> > white people who are desperate — desperate — to say, 'You know what? My
> > skin's white, but I'm not one of the white people who's destroying the
> > world.'"
> >
> > As a zombie leftist during the 1960s and 1970s, I know what that feeling
> > of desperation is like — what it's like to be a self-hating white. We
> > must get to the point where college-educated whites proudly and
> > confidently say they are white and that they do not want to become a
> > minority in America.
> >
> > This reminds me of the recent docudrama Milk, which depicts the life of
> > gay activist Harvey Milk. Milk is sure be nominated for an Oscar as Best
> > Picture because it lovingly illustrates a triumph of the cultural left.
> > But is has an important message that should resonate with the millions of
> > whites who have been deprived of their confidence and their culture: Be
> > explicit. Just as Harvey Milk advocated being openly gay even in the face
> > of dire consequences, whites need to tell their family and their friends
> > that they have an identity as a white person and believe that whites have
> > legitimate interests as white people. They must accept the consequences
> > when they are harassed, fired from their jobs, or put in prison for such
> > beliefs. They must run for political office as openly pro-white.
> >
> > Milk shows that homosexuals were fired from their jobs and arrested for
> > congregating in public. Now it's the Southern Poverty Law Center and the
> > rest of the leftist intellectual and political establishment that
> > harasses and attempts to get people fired. But it's the same situation
> > with the roles reversed. No revolution was ever accomplished without some
> > martyrs. The revolution that restores the legitimacy of white identity
> > and the legitimacy of white interests will be no exception.
> >
> > But it is a revolution that is absolutely necessary. The white majority
> > is foolish indeed to entrust its future to a utopian hope that racial and
> > ethnic identifications will disappear and that they won't continue to
> > influence public policy in ways that compromise the interests of whites.
> >
> > It does not take an overactive imagination to see that coalitions of
> > minority groups could compromise the interests of formerly dominant
> > whites. We already see numerous examples in which coalitions of minority
> > groups attempt to influence public policy, including immigration policy,
> > against the interests of the whites. Placing ourselves in a position of
> > vulnerability would be extremely risky, given the deep sense of
> > historical grievance fostered by many ethnic activists and organized
> > ethnic lobbies.
> >
> > This is especially the case with Jews. Jewish organisations have been
> > unanimous in condemning Western societies, Western traditions, and
> > Christianity, for past crimes against Jews. Similar sentiments are
> > typical of a great many African Americans and Latinos, and especially
> > among the ethnic activists from these groups. The "God damn America"
> > sermon by President Obama's pastor comes to mind as a recent notorious
> > example.
> >
> > The precedent of the early decades of the Soviet Union should give pause
> > to anyone who believes that surrendering ethnic hegemony does not carry
> > risks. The Bolshevik revolution had a pronounced ethnic angle: To a very
> > great extent, Jews and other non-Russians ruled over the Russian people,
> > with disastrous consequences for the Russians and other ethnic groups
> > that were not able to become part of the power structure. Jews formed a
> > hostile elite within this power structure — as they will in the future
> > white-minority America; Jews were "Stalin's willing executioners."
> >
> > Two passages from my review of Yuri Slezkine's The Jewish Century seem
> > particularly appropriate here. The first passage reminds me of the many
> > American Jews who adopt a veneer of support for leftist versions of
> > social justice and racial tolerance while nevertheless managing to
> > support racial Zionism and the mass murder, torture, and incarceration of
> > the Palestinian people in one of the largest prison systems the world has
> > ever seen. Such people may be very different when they become a hostile
> > elite in a white-minority America.
> >
> > Many of the commentators on Jewish Bolsheviks noted the "transformation"
> > of Jews [after the Bolshevik Revolution]. In the words of [a] Jewish
> > commentator, G. A. Landau, "cruelty, sadism, and violence had seemed
> > alien to a nation so far removed from physical activity." And another
> > Jewish commentator, Ia. A. Bromberg, noted that:
> >
> > the formerly oppressed lover of liberty had turned into a tyrant of 
> > "unheard-of-despotic arbitrariness"…. The convinced and unconditional
> > opponent of the death penalty not just for political crimes but for the
> > most heinous offenses, who could not, as it were, watch a chicken being
> > killed, has been transformed outwardly into a leather-clad person with a
> > revolver and, in fact, lost all human likeness. ...
> >
> > After the Revolution, ... there was active suppression of any remnants of
> > the older order and their descendants. ... The mass murder of peasants
> > and nationalists was combined with the systematic exclusion of the
> > previously existing non-Jewish middle class. The wife of a Leningrad
> > University professor noted, "in all the institutions, only workers and
> > Israelites are admitted; the life of the intelligentsia is very hard" (p.
> > 243). Even at the end of the 1930s, prior to the Russification that
> > accompanied World War II, "the Russian Federation…was still doing penance
> > for its imperial past while also serving as an example of an
> > ethnicity-free society" (p. 276). While all other nationalities,
> > including Jews, were allowed and encouraged to keep their ethnic
> > identities, the revolution remained an anti-majoritarian movement.
> >
> > The difference from the Soviet Union may well be that in white-minority
> > America it will not be workers and Israelites who are favored, but
> > non-whites and Israelites. Whites may dream that they are entering the
> > post-racial utopia imagined by their erstwhile intellectual superiors.
> > But it is quite possible that they are entering into a racial dystopia of
> > unimaginable cruelty in which whites will be systematically excluded in
> > favor of the new elites recruited from the soon-to-be majority. It's
> > happened before.
> >
> > Kevin MacDonald is a professor of psychology at California State
> > University–Long Beach.
> >
> > Permanent URL with hyperlinks:
> >
> > http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-Hsu.html
> >
> > -----------
> >
> >
> > Should Christians Support Israeli Terrorism in Gaza?
> >
> > A timely discussion between Rev. Ted Pike and Dr. David Duke, one
> > especially important for the Christians in our audience
> >
> > http://www.davidduke.com/mp3/dukeradio090122DukeandPikeonGaza.mp3
> >
> >  In this vital discussion, Rev. Pike and Dr. Duke explore the Pro-Israel
> > attitude of some Christian evangelical organizations, and why their
> > position not only goes directly against Christian morality and decency, 
> > but actually is directly opposite of that expressed by Christian
> > Scriptures. Today, Many Christians are instructed that Jews and today's
> > Israel has a special covenant" with God. In fact, the New Testament in
> > the clearest of language states that the Jews "continued not in my
> > covenant, and I considered them not, saith the Lord." Here's the quote
> > that Christians aren't supposed to notice.:
> >
> > 8:10 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers, in the
> > day when I took them by the hand out of the land of Egypt; because they
> > continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.
> > (Hebrews 8:10)
> >
> > They also don't seem to notice that a 2000 year old Judaic war against
> > Christianity that has been waged since time of Jesus Christ and still
> > goes on today with the most powerful Jewish organizations attempting to
> > destroy European and American traditions, that has even become a war on
> > our Christmas traditions.
> >
> > Dr. Duke and Ted Pike also speak about how over a hundred thousand
> > Christian Palestinians have suffered with their families from
> > anti-Christian Israel! Christian support of Israel has resulted in the
> > very birthplace of Jesus Christ, go from 90 percent Palestinian
> > Christians to 35 percent today because of Israeli terror and occupation.
> > They ask, "How could any Christian in good conscience support the
> > anti-Christian state of Israel, bombing the homes, killing and maiming,
> > torturing and oppressing fellow Christian men, women and children?"
> >
> > This is a vital show for every Christian reader and listener of
> > DavidDuke.com. Next time, you hear someone say, "God tells us that we
> > must support Israel" you will have the clear Christian answer that just
> > the opposite is true!
> >
> > For documentation on this be sure to read some of the well-footnoted,
> > sample chapters of Jewish Supremacism and My Awakening.
> >
> > Source :
> > 
> > http://www.davidduke.com/general/should-christians-support-israeli-terror
> >ism-in-gaza_7282.html
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------
> >
> > You or someone using your email adress is currently subscribed to the
> > Lawrence Auster Newletter. If you wish to unsubscribe from our mailing
> > list, please let us know by calling to 1 212 865 1284
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Lawrence Auster,
> > 238 W 101 St Apt. 3B
> > New York, NY  10025
> > Contact: lawrence.auster at att.net
> > -------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openmoko community mailing list
> > community at lists.openmoko.org
> > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community