[SHR-U] Dead Intone
seba.dos1 at gmail.com
Mon Jul 20 17:21:00 CEST 2009
On 7/11/09, c_c <cchandel at yahoo.com> wrote:
> PaulTT wrote:
>>>latest glamo patch i tried simply was running slower than the xv vo,
>>>so probably it's not yet worth the job, afaik, and imho, just to be
> That's interesting. Kind of agrees with what Raster's being saying all
> along - that the glamo is not really accelerating all that well. I hope to
> be proven wrong though!
Using glamo acceleration can be faster than Xv or slower than Xv. It
all depends of file, which you are trying to open. We have quite glamo
on quite slow bus, so acceleration makes sense for instance when
displaying 320x240 rotated video on fullscreen.
More information about the community