seba.dos1 at gmail.com
Sat Jul 25 17:27:26 CEST 2009
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 17:21, Nicola Mfb<nicola.mfb at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Sebastian
> Krzyszkowiak<seba.dos1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> We just don't want to release crap as "stable". There were problems
>> with either FSO, SHR, build system etc. We wanted to start releasing
>> testing images regular every week... week ago. But there is opkg
>> problem, which is preventing us from doing that. Do you really want
>> buggy and unstable system marked as "stable", only due to deadline?
>> And "unstable" is bleeding-edge. As it should be.
> You should "feel" the air.
> As in the past testing was only a snapshot and AFAIK I never saw a
> backport to testing, peoples are inclined to use unstable in every
> case (and I really hope your future effort on testing will go
That's exactly what we want to change now and what i said, but making
-testing which is can't be upgraded doesn't make sense. So for
-testing you have to wait until actual problems with opkg are solved
(and that's unfortunately our fault, not OE or someone else).
More information about the community