seba.dos1 at gmail.com
Mon Jul 27 17:47:47 CEST 2009
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 14:00, Patryk Benderz<Patryk.Benderz at esp.pl> wrote:
> Dnia 2009-07-27, pon o godzinie 13:01 +0200, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:41, Patryk Benderz<Patryk.Benderz at esp.pl> wrote:
>> > [cut]
>> >> You should "feel" the air.
>> >> As in the past testing was only a snapshot and AFAIK I never saw a
>> > [...]
>> >> guess why their software crashes on latest shr, rebuild and upload
>> >> again on opkg.org and so on).
>> > Well, Sebastian, i have to say Nicola has a point here. I agree.
>> > [cut]
>> No, I don't agree. It's natural than packages builded on your own will
>> be outdated some time in future. That's why I think opkg.org is bad
>> idea as "www repo" (it should be rather app overview).
> Read again what Nicola wrote:
> *"I never saw a backport to testing..." I neither saw, did you?
> *"actually shr is...way...to use...FR in a modern way out of the box"
> again agree and I think you agree too :)
> *"please provide a really supported testing *branch* and not a snapshot"
> Do you think SHR devs shouldn't provide genuine testing branch?
> These are the points i agree with. Probably you just looked at the last
> sentence, cause i have cited whole paragraph?
But these are the points I already said I agree with, and I also said
that SHR is going this way. I thought I don't have to repeat it :x
More information about the community