Fundamental Qi question
werner at openmoko.org
Thu Jun 4 15:00:39 CEST 2009
arne anka wrote:
> - what reasons make you say, sd is the future?
The main reasons are:
- much easier handling. SD is like a disk, so you can use all the
standard tools and get standard behaviour. NAND needs a lot of
exceptional treatment to properly address wear and factory-bad
blocks. I.e., you can't just pretend it's a regular disk but
need special file systems, special tools, special partitioning,
and all that.
- the price/performance point of SD is set at the time you buy the
SD card while that of NAND is set when the device is designed.
So NAND always lags behind trends in capacity growth.
- if all the data of a device is stored on SD, you have a lot more
flexibility when moving data across systems. E.g., you could
share a phone among people, use multiple phones with the same data,
have completely separate work/personal or regular/travel
> - what reasons, except the impossibility to replace the nand when it is
> worn out by to many write operations, led to the decision to use nand
The complexity of recovering from catastrophic NAND corruption. With
GTA01, you needed the debug board. GTA02 has an expensive and (for
most purposes) non-upgradeable NOR chip. With no valuable changeable
state in the device, the whole issue of recovering a bricked device
disappears, since you can just use a different/externally repaired
More information about the community