Troubles with opkg.org repo
Joel Newkirk
freerunner at newkirk.us
Fri Mar 13 01:13:36 CET 2009
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:05:03 +0200
"Risto H. Kurppa" <risto at kurppa.fi> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Joel Newkirk <freerunner at newkirk.us>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 15:05:10 +0100
> > Thomas Zimmermann <zimmermann at vdm-design.de> wrote:
> >
> >> Additionally there are a lot of Packages that don't contain a
> >> control file with depencies and so on:
> >>
> >> Form the packages in debian format are these:
> >>
> >> 0_tshark_1.0.99+svnr26030_armv4t.ipk
> >> 0_wireshark-common_1.0.99+svnr26030_armv4t.ipk
> >> 1_wireshark_1.0.99+svnr26030_armv4t.ipk
> >
> >>
> >> So if the authors of these packages can update them that would be
> >> great.
> >
> > I contributed those three - sorry, I hadn't noticed they were in
> > your list. Strange, I downloaded the files from opkg.org and they
> > are significantly smaller than the originals I uploaded. They
> > contain the beginnings of the correct data, specifically
> > debian-binary and the start of data.tar.gz, but are truncated. The
> > tshark package, eg, is supposed to be 106606 bytes, but the
> > download from opkg.org is only 65536 bytes. In fact, all three are
> > truncated to powers of two as well
> > - multiples of 4096 bytes...
> >
> > I'll try resubmitting them yet again, though not until tomorrow.
> > (I'm off to bed) Clearly the files are getting broken at some
> > point in the process, I'll try to rule out upload.
>
> Thanks for uploading them again.
> I hope uploading again helps but I have the feeling that it's
> something else, or that the upload fails for some reason and it has
> really nothing to do with your actions.. Let's see if the scripts get
> fixed at some point.
>
>
> r
>
I uploaded them again, then re-downloaded to be sure - as of right now,
at least, they are correct and intact. Uploaded the same files, from
the same desktop machine, with the same browser. :(
j
More information about the community
mailing list