Debian package for pythm Was: [debian] Packaging python apps, f.e. pythm...
dscaini at gmail.com
Mon Mar 16 17:15:14 CET 2009
I believe that's a nice idea to converge our efforts in having something
really usable/complete soon.
IMHO the path "open repo"->improvement of packs->pkg-fso should be efficace.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Marcel <tanuva at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Am Monday 16 March 2009 16:51:24 schrieb Timo Juhani Lindfors:
> > Marcel <tanuva at googlemail.com> writes:
> > > (pkg-fso for example). To achieve this the requirements to get into
> > > pkg-fso shouldn't be too demanding imho.
> > I thought pkg-fso was a temporary repository for packages that are
> > aiming to enter debian. I would be surprised if I got some low-quality
> > stuff from there.
> > > An open repository like opkg.org but accessible directly from apt
> > > be ideal.
> > I'm afraid that'd have very low quality :-(
> Package quality is an issue indeed, but I'd prefer an "open repository"
> that term already exist?) over packages spread all over the web even if
> quality suffers from that. One could improve packages later on and then
> include them into pkg-fso/debian.
> If people get to know their future favourite software by finding it on
> and then go and improve the package so that it can be included in debian,
> that would be the way I'd go... (Which implies people knowing that $repo
> isn't the final place to go.)
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community at lists.openmoko.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the community