[Announce] Intel and Nokia announce open source telephony
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
mickey at vanille-media.de
Wed May 13 00:25:41 CEST 2009
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 00:17:26 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 07:52:48AM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 May 2009 16:40:48 +0200 Pander <pander at users.sourceforge.net>
> > > Steve 'dillo Okay (Roadknight Mobility Labs) wrote:
> > > > On May 11, 2009, at 13:26 , community-request at lists.openmoko.org
> > > >> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM, David Reyes Samblas Martinez
> > > >> <david at tuxbrain.com
> > > >>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Ok another api framework for smartphones,this time provided by big
> > > >> guys, but which hardware?, I haven't see any reference on that in
> > > >> the web site. any clue any one?
> > > >
> > > > "OpenNoko" anyone ? :)
> > >
> > > LOL
> > >
> > > Why don't they adapt what is already out there... Otherwise it would be
> > > OpenNono
> > the simple version it seems is that they simply don't like fso's api.
> > marcel holtmann said its too low-level and they don't see it as something
> > they want. ask them for more details - but tat seems to be the gist of
> > it.
> I'm a layman but that seems bonkers if that's their "official" argument...
> they could always add a layer above it :(
Besides that a) it really isn't too low level -- it's rather an appropriate
compromise between the 3GPP specs and what applications want to know -- and b)
there's an even higher level already available in FSO called ophone.
More information about the community