[Om2009] a community effort
Quakeman1 at gmx.net
Sun May 31 10:46:02 CEST 2009
William Kenworthy wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 21:07 +0300, Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
>> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <rms at 1407.org> wrote:
>>> Is Qi reliable enough already to migrate from u-boot?
> no, fails to boot occasionally, and because it doesnt print anything to
> screen you dont know until much later ...
> so not unless things have changed and it seems currently unmaintained.
> Be nice to be corrected as uboot seems essentially in the same boat, but
> at least its more reliable.
I use QI for some months now and it never failed once to boot my neo. I
also changed the version of qi some times to a newer version but this
never changed the working state for me. :)
So think of QI as stable enough for daily use.
More information about the community