[Om2009] a community effort
billk at iinet.net.au
Sun May 31 15:58:32 CEST 2009
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 10:46 +0200, Fox Mulder wrote:
> William Kenworthy wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 21:07 +0300, Risto H. Kurppa wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <rms at 1407.org> wrote:
> >>> Is Qi reliable enough already to migrate from u-boot?
> >> Yes
> >> r
> > no, fails to boot occasionally, and because it doesnt print anything to
> > screen you dont know until much later ...
> > so not unless things have changed and it seems currently unmaintained.
> > Be nice to be corrected as uboot seems essentially in the same boat, but
> > at least its more reliable.
> I use QI for some months now and it never failed once to boot my neo. I
> also changed the version of qi some times to a newer version but this
> never changed the working state for me. :)
> So think of QI as stable enough for daily use.
ok, thats a few saying it works so I'll give it another try. But I
really really dont like the way it doesnt inform the user whats
More information about the community