Centralization of graphical awesomeness
omega.xavier at gmail.com
Wed Oct 28 10:31:16 CET 2009
DJDAS a écrit :
> rixed at happyleptic.org wrote:
>> The problem is : on the freerunner we merely need something to display some
>> simple widgets, scroll the screen smoothly (because on a small display you
>> always need to scroll) and be reactive to user finger pressures. If E, because
>> of an ambitious design, is unable to perform this on the freerunner, then it's
>> simply not a good fit. You can say that the hardware does not fit E or that E
>> does not fit the hardware, the fact is we have much more free software to run
>> on the freerunner that free hardware to run E.
> Finally! This was my point of view nothing else! :) Thank you for
> explaining in a simple manner :)
But E *is able to perform this*, in a better way than the other solutions.
You seem to think E is an ambitious/too complicated/too slow piece of
software. You are obviously wrong here.
E is an optimized piece of software, probably the best one when you have
hard constraints (like on mobile devices).
Use a theme with -- as you wrote -- "some simple widgets" and you will
see that E is the fastest one.
And stop comparing E in SHR/Om2009 (complicated multi layer theme for a
not so good look) with QtMoko (simple theme for a good look), because
being 2x faster when you display 3x simpler widgets is not significant.
More information about the community