Centralization of graphical awesomeness
djdas at djdas.net
Wed Oct 28 12:27:43 CET 2009
Cedric BAIL wrote:
> So either you have something like QtMoko without fancy stuff, and it
> will be faster, or you have some fancy effect, but slower fps. That's
> it. You can cry, you can yell, it will not be possible to do something
> more than that. Yes, it is frustrating, but the world is like that,
> you need to compromise.
That's exactly what I said in my previous post it's not me that is
saying "E is the best piece of software, all the others are sh*t" and
I'm not crying, I worked to optimize my personal distribution based on
an old FDOM and it's quite responsive and daily since september 2008, I
try always to optimize things and some time share my knowledge with
other people, I don't agree with Raster and SHR maintainers simply
because they don't care users but think about themselves and this is why
I never installed SHR and won't never write a program using EFL.
Did you see any other posts from me crying my FR is slow and unstable
and unresponsive and shi**y and so on? No! I simply wrote yesterday
because I saw since last year only messages like "you have a bad
hardware so what you want?" and I don't think it's a good promotion to
achieve new customers or developers to the community...so if you tell me
that this is the approach I take it on account and will do my work for
myself not trying to share my knowledge with a community which rounds
only around Raster and SHR like Gods....
I want to be proactive not simple yell, but I see only people who say
"Raster is right" not trying to study or thinking in a different way...
Can you point me at someone who is different from this approach?
> Choice has been make that people prefer fancy
> stuff over speed, and you are one of them apparently,
Maybe you missed my previous posts, I said exactly the opposite: I don't
NEED nor want fancy stuff at the price of speed this is why I don't
consider E *FOR ME* a good piece of software....because I prefer to have
something responsive and written to be to, especially if its aimed at an
embedded device with low capabilities (in general but especially the FR).
> You don't want to solve the problem. You want the world to be like you
> dream it.
I want a world in which a community shares its thoughts and discovers,
not a community which depends on 3-4 people who say "I'm right you're
wrong, stop!" and think them as God in Earth....Passiveness is bad, EVER!
> But this hardware has limitation that you should take into
> account, if you don't, you will wast your energy and the energy of
> others for nothing. And yes, it costs to accept that the hardware we
> have is not as powerfull as we would like it to be. And yes, it costs
> to accept compromise. Welcome to the real world.
I perfectly know this and if you read carefully my previous posts you
see exactly what you're writing
> So now, I ask you, what do you propose ? At least raster give you a
> few possibility.
I'm not a graphic expert, I'm trying to test some stuffs and looking for
alternatives, when I'll reach a milestone if you'll be interested I'll
share my thoughts...
More information about the community