[debian] frameworkd bug?

Nikita V. Youshchenko yoush at debian.org
Tue Sep 22 20:46:17 CEST 2009


> > community@ is a bit high-traffic, don't you find so ;-)
>
> no doubt about that -- but then again: you catched, didn't you ;-)

I've only sent a link to your post to pkg-fso-maint - I won't work on the 
fix myself, at least not in ongoing days :(

> a matter like incomplete unicode handling is no doubt relevant for
> upstream too, so what would be the best course of action?
> - simply doing reportbug?
> - posting only pkg-fso and expecting the package maintainer to transport
> further upstream?
> - double posting at least pkg-fso and smartphones-userland (or
> -standard?)?

Not -standard - it's about standards and not implementation.

Since Debian carries something that differs from upstream head, it is more 
correct to send bugs to debian packages maintainers first. Pkg-fso-maint 
is the correct list for that.

Nikita
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/attachments/20090922/f00a810e/attachment.pgp 


More information about the community mailing list