When is the next and more powerful openmoko releasing

Joshua Judson Rosen rozzin at geekspace.com
Fri Aug 13 03:45:49 CEST 2010

Brian <bneil at rochester.rr.com> writes:
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:55:21 +0200
> "Dr. Michael Lauer" <mickey at vanille-media.de> wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately the freedom loving people are doomed to either work on
> > anti-vendor-ports (such as HTC devices etc.) or live with one of the
> > semi-free alternatives (Palm Pre, Nokia N900). Right now there is no 
> > device rivaling the FreeRunner's openness, nothing comes close.
> I wouldn't necessarily color all ports of FOSS as anti-vendor. In fact
> don't they demonstrate the versatility and adaptability of FOSS in
> relation to all hardware, especially hardware that isn't open? That's a
> good thing if the goal is to strive towards choice for consumers.
> Granted it's not the ideal situation but it is a step in the right
> direction.

The term "anti-vendor port" initially struck me as a little odd, as well,
but now I think that Mickey is using a fairly strict definition of "anti-",
meaning "contrary to"--with "anti-vendor" meaning "contrary to the vendor"
or (more clearly) "contrary to the wishes or actions of the vendor".

"Don't be afraid to ask (λf.((λx.xx) (λr.f(rr))))."

More information about the community mailing list