grsecurity in kernel?
Vinzenz Hersche
hersche at puzzle.ch
Wed Dec 29 23:52:30 CET 2010
it should need just be a patched
kernel (so need to recompile) and a loaded kernel or what do you think?
...a loaded module, of course.. sry, typo.. :)
-----------------------------------------------
Vinzenz schrieb am Mittwoch 29 Dezember 2010:
Glenn, i like to try this for a kernel.. it should need just be a patched
kernel (so need to recompile) and a loaded module or what do you think?
i don't know so much about cross-compile, but i like to learn it.. if also
someone else like to join the try or so, you're welcome :)
Timo, you'r right about X.. that's a big hole.. how is it on qtmoko, because
of no x-server?
-----------------------------------------------
Timo schrieb am Mittwoch 29 Dezember 2010:
Glenn <glenn.mh.dk at gmail.com> writes:
> Maybe it might be a good idea to embed grsecurity in the kernel - for
> two reasons:
I think the main goal should be to upstream our changes, not add new
changes that are not upstream.
> * Debug programs and drivers (faster debugging?)
What has grsecurity to do with debugging?
> * Heighten security
I'd first urge people to run their X appliations as non-root :-)
_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community at lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community at lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
More information about the community
mailing list